Re: bindv6only again
On 2010-05-04, Vincent Danjean <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 27/04/2010 13:43, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Apr 27, Simon Huggins <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Anyway, is there a reason that #560238 isn't blocked by #560044 given it
>>> breaks that package or are you not bothered about breaking non-free
>> Nobody bothered to register this in the BTS, I did now.
>> I am not a java user, so I am unable to evaluate the practical impact of
>> this implementation being still broken.
> From now, you can expect lots of French squeeze users being hit by
> this bug.
You have to expect testing and unstable breaking occassionally. Did you
try icedtea-plugin (i.e. the free variant)?
> So, with the current setting in sqeeze, the current practical impact
> will be a very hard to diagnose bug for most of French Debian users (and a
> bad publicity for Debian as it will be the only one Linux distribution
> that will not work).
It's not even stable.