[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bindv6only again

On Thursday 13 May 2010 15:33:42 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Proprietary, granted, but why buggy?  bindv6only=0 is assumed by both
> POSIX and RFC 3493.
I agree with you, but in this mailing list apparently the word "standard" 
might mean many many things.

You might say "standard" meaning "i will go to a pub tonight" or "i am triying 
to get superpowers".

Quoting a dictionary doesn't work.

Salvo Tomaselli

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: