Re: graphicsmagick or imagemagick
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Jérémy Lal <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> 2) if so, why graphicsmagick is not widely used ?
> The migration "looks" easy. I feel i'm missing something.
Probably a simple matter of mindshare and inertia. imagemagick has
been around for longer. graphicsmagick probably hasn't done enough
marketting to overcome the imagemagick inertia. For me, imagemagick is
good enough and the benefits of graphicsmagick aren't that obvious.