Re: Bug#565675: ITP: pthsem -- pth replacement with semaphore support
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > * Package name : pthsem
> > > Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the
> > > existing pth package?
> > The situation with GNU pth is:
> I guessed so, but still.
> Were I Martin Kögler, I'd even just request GNU to become the new
> maintainer of pth.
...which is usually done by writing to <firstname.lastname@example.org>.
It is counter-productive to start a fork just because GNU pth is
unmaintained upstream (it is not an officially "orphaned" GNU package,
AFAICS, but that doesn't matter much if it really is neglected).