Re: Conflicting information about buildd status and testing migration
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Hanke <firstname.lastname@example.org> (15/01/2010):
> > out of date on hppa: fsl (from 4.1.1-1)
> > out of date on mipsel: fsl (from 4.0.4-1)
> > and that is supported by the arch listing on
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/fsl
> “rmadison fsl” is usually how one checks for this.
Thanks. What I get from there is the same that I get from the website.
> > Unfortunately, the buildd logs for this non-free package that used
> > to be here:
> > http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=fsl&ver=4.1.4-2&arch=hppa
> > are currently (or no longer) available.
> > I'd be glad for some hints what is happening here.
Hmm, so the buildds are working just the website is not available.
That puts me exactly where I started: Information from the buildds
suggests the package is built for all archs, the website and rmadison
say "no". I have no logs to check, hence I still have no clue.
What information is the output of
based on? I guess it doesn't assume that packages are built properly be
GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke