[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Conflicting information about buildd status and testing migration

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Hanke <michael.hanke@gmail.com> (15/01/2010):
> >   out of date on hppa: fsl (from 4.1.1-1)
> >   out of date on mipsel: fsl (from 4.0.4-1)
> > 
> > 
> > and that is supported by the arch listing on
> > 
> >   http://packages.debian.org/sid/fsl
> “rmadison fsl” is usually how one checks for this.

Thanks. What I get from there is the same that I get from the website.

> > Unfortunately, the buildd logs for this non-free package that used
> > to be here:
> > 
> >   http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=fsl&ver=4.1.4-2&arch=hppa
> > 
> > are currently (or no longer) available.
> > 
> > I'd be glad for some hints what is happening here.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-wb-team/2010/01/msg00012.html

Hmm, so the buildds are working just the website is not available.

That puts me exactly where I started: Information from the buildds
suggests the package is built for all archs, the website and rmadison
say "no". I have no logs to check, hence I still have no clue.

What information is the output of


based on? I guess it doesn't assume that packages are built properly be


GPG key:  1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke

Reply to: