On Mon Nov 02 11:40, Luk Claes wrote: > For the actual matter at hand I think it's very wrong to do a MBF > without going through d-devel for several reasons: > <snip reasons> Otoh, this is a slightly special case, since they are things which are causing the package to become non-uploadable. In this case the correct place to have the discussion about the scope et al of the bugs is with ftp-master about what constitutes rejection criteria; the bug filing is purely a reflection of that. I certainly don't think that having packages with an upload-critical bug with no bug filed against them is a good idea Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature