Re: Bug#553936: FTBFS with binutils-gold
On 02/11/09 at 12:12 +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2009-11-02, Lucas Nussbaum <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
> >> important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
> >> binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
> >> your executables.
> > Since this obviously breaks lots of packages, what about changing the
> > default in binutils-gold instead?
> Binutils-gold is not the default. It is a bit 'stricter' in how it
> works, but it is notably faster.
I was talking about not making --no-add-needed the default in
| Lucas Nussbaum
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: email@example.com GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |