Re: Lintian based autorejects
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Nov 02 11:40, Luk Claes wrote:
>> For the actual matter at hand I think it's very wrong to do a MBF
>> without going through d-devel for several reasons:
>> <snip reasons>
> Otoh, this is a slightly special case, since they are things which are
> causing the package to become non-uploadable. In this case the correct
> place to have the discussion about the scope et al of the bugs is with
> ftp-master about what constitutes rejection criteria; the bug filing is
> purely a reflection of that.
Right, though filing bugs already is ignoring that step completely.
> I certainly don't think that having packages with an upload-critical bug
> with no bug filed against them is a good idea
I'm not saying that bugs should not be filed, though the content and
meta information of bugs can be very much improved by discussing before