Re: libjpeg62-dev -> libjpeg-dev transition

[Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>]

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Actually, I have already done a test-rebuild of all the packages that
> > build-depends on libjpeg62-dev or libjpeg-dev against a modified libjpeg7-dev
> > that provide both libjpeg62-dev and libjpeg-dev, and there is only six FTBFS
> > five of them being just test-suite update, and I send a patch for the sixth
> > (netpbm) in the BTS.
> 
> That' be great (if not already done) to open important bugs on those
> packages please, so that we can track that down.

This the summary of the result:

1) FTBFS in sid with libjpeg62-dev anyway:
avifile:      FTBFS #526536
blender:      FTBFS #545622
crystalspace: FTBFS #543082
dillo:        FTBFS #515271  
emacs22:      FTBFS #545497
emacs23:      FTBFS #545379
fgfs-atlas:   FTBFS #545593
gqcam:        FTBFS #515314
graphviz:     FTBFS #542979
hdf-eos5:     FTBFS #545833
kaffe:        FTBFS #529872
ntop:         FTBFS #527757
openvrml:     FTBFS #490334, #534055
paintlib:     FTBFS #546167
player:       FTBFS #524746
rezound:      FTBFS #529952, #529967
slony1:       FTBFS #536929
vegastrike:   FTBFS #530483, #537005
stage:        uninstallable build-dep->#524746

2) Package too large to be tested:
openoffice.org: too large

3) Package that fail to compile:
netpbm-free:  patch #546416

4) Package that build but fail test-suite:
sdop:                 testsuite
graphicsmagick:       testsuite
libgd-gd2-noxpm-perl: testsuite
libgd-gd2-perl:       testsuite

5) a small number (~5) of packages need to be updated to be compatible
with libjpeg7 raw interface (this is a one-line change). I will 
report bugs.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here.