On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 18:25 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > That is the thread at large. Currently it was about why nnn-quiet is no > suitable workaround if the followup address for users (nnn@) would suddenly > also mail users. Speaking of -quiet, I'd be happy to see that die. Or at the very least, -submitter needs to stop setting reply-to to -quiet. Cheers, Julien