Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 18:25 +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit : > That is the thread at large. Currently it was about why nnn-quiet is no > suitable workaround if the followup address for users (nnn@) would suddenly > also mail users. Then use nnn-maintonly@, which will reach the PTS and mailing lists. Or let’s create another alias to handle such exceptions. Whatever, as long as the default behavior is made sane. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=