Re: Explicitely Cc bug reporters
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:23:32PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:08:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > When the maintainer think the bug reporter is not to be annoyed, then he
> > should mail nnn-silent or whatever, because that is the exception.
>
> Full ACK.
>
> > Not the reverse. This is a major (if not _THE_ major) annoyance with the
> > BTS. FWIW this is a long discussed issue, and the BTS maintainers do not
> > share this opinion (that mailing nnnn@ should also mail the submitter)
> > so we're basically stuck.
>
> Conceptually, what "we" want is trivial: we want submitter to be
> subscribed (in the sense of "bts subscribe") by default. If they want,
> they are free to opt unsubscribing.
That should probably be something that would fly for me actually. and
you could make reportbug take an option to add some kind of pseudo
header so that subscribing is not done for the rare cases when sender
doesn't want to be subscribed.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
Reply to: