On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:52:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:40:44PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:04:33PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Sep 06, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > When should maintainers start adding upstart jobs to their packages?
> > > > Not before the upstart compat package that provides upstart-job for
> > > > sysvinit-based systems is available.
> > > Is this relevant for Linux-specific packages as well? I.e., do we want
> > > to continue supporting sysvinit on Linux systems?
>
> > for one: LSB somehow requires it.
>
> No. The LSB requires *LSB packages* to use init scripts. Debian
> packages are not LSB packages.
Okay, my mistake.
> > second: I think it's disruptive for users to be unable to do
> > /etc/init.d/$service stop/start/restart anymore.
>
> The transition plan here is to allow users to use the 'service' command
> ('service $service stop/start/restart') as an abstraction layer. If the
> ports all migrate to upstart too, we'll eventually want to stop shipping
> these symlinks.
I see. Let's hope our SHELLs will pick up completions soon enough then
;)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature