Re: udev and /usr
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:58:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 04, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Why do you not extend the current setup to do another step? Currently we
> Even if this were possible at all, it would require (for a start):
> - working out all the possible side effects of synthesizing all/most
> (which ones?) events a second time
This is already the case.
> - having to forward port these changes forever, with the possibility of
> a new architectural change making the exercise useless at any time
Which change? This is an additional init script or so.
> > You could just add another ("change") trigger run after all filesystems
> > are available. (Okay, this extra names must not be used in the fstab at
> > all then.)
> No reason to bother then, persistent names are indispensable for many
> non-trivial systems.
Hu? So you did not even read what I said.
Bastian
--
Madness has no purpose. Or reason. But it may have a goal.
-- Spock, "The Alternative Factor", stardate 3088.7
Reply to: