Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 à 12:40 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> * `Bug-<Vendor>` or `Bug` (optional)
>
> - It contains one or more URLs (space separated) pointing to the related bugs
> - (possibly fixed by the patch). The `Bug` field is reserved
> - for the bug URL(s) in the upstream bug tracker.
> + It contains one URL pointing to the related bug (possibly fixed by the
> + patch). The `Bug` field is reserved for the bug URL in the upstream
> + bug tracker. Those fields can be used multiple times if several
> + bugs are concerned.
It’s already better, but for more readability, would it be possible to
have a registered list of bug tracking aliases? For example:
Bug-Debian: #12345
Bug-Ubuntu: #2356
Bug-GNOME: #5671
Otherwise, I appreciate the proposed changes. They make it less of a
problem if the information in the package is not up-to-date and follow
our maintenance process closely.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=