brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> (14/05/2009): > I've worked on FTBFS-with-new-GCC bugs before, and realized only after > putting significant work into the bug that the package didn't build on > amd64, only on i386. Therefore, I think that the package should have > a proper list of archs that prevents this problem. P-a-s is fine for > the buildds, but if you actually want people to volunteer to fix bugs > on your package, you shouldn't make it harder on them. Which is why people are expected to: - Make their packages FTBFS ASAP in the build system, to make it obvious it's not intended to even be tried on $archs. - Then get the P-a-s entry added. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature