[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NEW processing

Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:39:12PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa a écrit :
> Most of the REJECTs are very trivial, so any peer review helps to spot
> them. I'd say that 90% of the REJECTs are simple "the package contains
> license X files but X isn't listed in debian/copyright." Spotting
> these before the package hits NEW speeds up the process a lot.

Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:32:23PM +0100, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> I would strongly advertise a public collaborative license and copyright check.
> That is the kind of work that we could all do and report in the NEW queue. 

Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:33:00PM +0000, James Westby a écrit :
> There seems to be an interest in reviewing things in NEW, but this
> is difficult due to NEW policies. Why not simply move the review to
> be before NEW? For example, post your packages that will have to go
> through NEW to debian-mentors@, requesting a NEW-like check, and
> upload when you are satisfied with the reviews that you have.

Hi all,

Here is a wiki page proposing two parallel workflows for pre- or post-upload
peer review.


Have a nice read :)

Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

Reply to: