On Mar 20, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote: > udev is desired, nearly required for big systems, right. It's bloat and It's not. > trouble for embedded or limited ones. I don't do embedded personally so I > have no idea how udev fares there, but I can tell you that vservers and udev > don't go well together. Udev expects a real system where there's none and > then gets confused -- vserver is hardly more than a glorified chroot, nearly > identical to BSD jails. You want every container to be small and simple. This is why you install udev in the host system and bind-mount its /dev to the /dev of each context. vserver and openvz are not relevant for the purpose of this discussion. On Mar 20, Mike Bird <mgb-debian@yosemite.net> wrote: > > popcon shows that the number is trivial. Definitely not "many". > Perhaps sysadmins that go to the effort of removing udev from > some systems are less likely to install popcon on those systems? And surely lurkers agree with you in personal emails... -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature