Re: Correct way to rename a binary package

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
From: ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:43:04 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] udlabhpjknr.fsf@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
References: <[🔎] 87tzfxzpwd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <[🔎] 8b2d7b4d0806130258i35b0f136ra4418493fdcb8a25@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.10.0806131322480.25006@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 20080613132447.GA14737@ouaza.com> <[🔎] 87wskt5r86.fsf@gismo.pca.it>

Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> writes:

>   Package: hunchentoot
>   Version: 2.0
>   Provides: cl-hunchentoot [1]
>   Replace: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
>   Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
>
>   Package: cl-hunchentoot
>   Depends: hunchentoot
>
> Am I correct?

I believe so, modulo one typo (Replace: vs. Replaces:).  Thanks for
taking care to allow a smooth transition.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu

Reply to:

References:
- Correct way to rename a binary package
  - From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
- Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
  - From: "Sandro Tosi" <matrixhasu@gmail.com>
- Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
  - From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>

Prev by Date: Re: ecki is retiring (Debian RT)
Next by Date: Re: ecki is retiring (Debian RT)
Previous by thread: Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
Next by thread: Re: Correct way to rename a binary package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread