On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:41:25AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Do, 15 Mai 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > I beg to differ. This particular mail is important enough to be sent to > > > > d-d-a instead of d-i-a. > > > > > > I agree, dia is not what I would be subscribed to under normal > > > circumstances, and with all the caos that type of announce is for dda. > > > > Which is why the initial mail about the issue went to both. If you read > > the first mail you will know where to find the rest. If you can't be > > bothered to read carefully when asked to (and lots can't) then I cannot > > help you. > > Come on, should I now subscribe to dia only for one (1!!) email (or > maybe 2) which are of general interest?? > No. If you are expecting something on the list but do not want to subscribe, the list archives are always available: http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature