[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#457318: qmail and related packages in NEW

Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> writes:
> So it might well be that those SMTP servers, that accept mail regardless
> of the existence of the recipient mailbox, take load off your server's
> spam processing, because they eat spammer's resources.

I rather use a MTA that implements SMTP time delays to force the
spammer to slow down, thank you very much. I even endorse greylisting
(with a whitelist) nowadays, but you'll never see me endorsing QMail
until it is patched.

> Concerning the delayed delivery notifications, there's an efficient way
> to immediately reject those in the SMTP connection, see

I rather not force other mail admins to implement measurements to deal
with another MTA's stupidity.

* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P)  *
*           PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer           *

Reply to: