Re: Bug#457318: qmail and related packages in NEW
Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> writes:
> I've yet to be pointed to a grave or serious bug in the packages pending
> in NEW, otherwise I see no reason why they shouldn't be processed and
> pass NEW. I completely agree with this well written post
Does the package in NEW fix the well known backscatter spam issue? I
tried searching for the fix in the package but unfortunately failed.
If it doesn't, then IMO, at this day and age, a MTA sending
backscatter spam doesn't belong to Debian.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
Reply to: