Re: Bug#457318: qmail and related packages in NEW

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#457318: qmail and related packages in NEW
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:05:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vdu0jlw4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20081204090303.22790.qmail@af3c1d158587ce.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> (Gerrit Pape's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:03:03 +0000")
References: <20081128181242.32463.qmail@6879aebe33b239.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <[🔎] 87zljec1l2.fsf@obelix.mork.no> <[🔎] 20081204090303.22790.qmail@af3c1d158587ce.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>

* Gerrit Pape:

> Right now, upstream doesn't completely agree with Andree's list of
> bugs.

Out of curiosity, does netqmail fix at least the delayed bounce
problem?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#457318: qmail and related packages in NEW
  - From: Bjørn Mork <bmork@dod.no>
- Re: Bug#457318: qmail and related packages in NEW
  - From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>

Prev by Date: Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC
Next by Date: Re: NEW processing
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#457318: qmail and related packages in NEW
Next by thread: Bug#507548: ITP: libtest-needsdisplay-perl -- Ensure that tests needing a display have one
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread