[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?

Le lundi 20 octobre 2008 à 16:34 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:21:24PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > What if, instead of ranting everywhere, you actually contributed code to
> > fix these bugs?
> I did...

And you deserve kudos for that. But that doesn’t make this current
thread less of a troll. You cannot ask, so late in the release process,
to introduce several thousand-lines patches in the kernel, even if they
finally exist. And you can’t say you were ignoring the situation until
now. It should have been obvious that, given how they evolved, these
bugs would be ignored for lenny.

> > I don’t recall the release team being reluctant to letting bug fixes
> > (especially serious ones) migrate to lenny.
> ...but you missed the point.  They're not wishlist bugs.  If they were, I
> wouldn't care much about them.

They are serious bugs. And if we waited to have zero serious bugs before
releasing, we’d never release. That’s why lenny-ignore tags are here.

: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: