Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?"

To: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
Cc: Debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?"
From: James Vega <jamessan@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:50:18 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080723225018.GB8240@jamessan.com>
Mail-followup-to: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>, Debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4887B158.4050107@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 4887B158.4050107@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:31:52AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> During a regular upgrade of my laptop (follows lenny) I have seen these messages:

Looks like the same issue discussed earlier in the week.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/07/msg00643.html

-- 
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?"
  - From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again)
Next by Date: Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again)
Previous by thread: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?"
Next by thread: Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread