Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:03:50 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080721110350.GD26272@bee.dooz.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 873am4w73l.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <[🔎] 20080720124353.GA22440@osamu.debian.net> <[🔎] 1216571551.3621.10.camel@dwarf.codehelp> <[🔎] 87zloc1p8a.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 200807201957.29075.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] 1216577290.3621.24.camel@dwarf.codehelp> <[🔎] 873am4w73l.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008, Ben Finney wrote:
> However, the above bug in the Debian BTS has been archived. Must we
> open another bug to ask for the change to be reverted?

 Perhaps you can use a GreaseMonkey script to remove it for you, or
 request a cookie / URL parameter to hide it.

-- 
Loïc Minier

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

References:
- Good communication with upstream is good idea
  - From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
  - From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
- Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
  - From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
- Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
Next by Date: Re: FHS and /var/www
Previous by thread: Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
Next by thread: Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread