On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:14:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > David Paleino wrote: > > > Firstly, it's not obsolete, since we only have sysvinit available (if we had > > upstart, or something similar to initng, I could've agreed here -- and > > upstart in Debian is way more experimental than initng). > > I doubt you can back up this claim. My experiences with both initng and > upstart have taught me the opposite. upstart was way more reliable and > mature. I can't really back up my claim; it was just my experience after an apt-get install upstart :) > One reason is, that the current version of upstart in experimental still > uses the sysv init scripts. This is by design though, so you can have a > smooth transition. This is great, thanks for the info. > [..] > > The reason why upstart is in experimental is different (unresolved issue > about sysvinit being essential and upstart conflicting with it). Probably this broke my system when I installed upstart. Going to read upstart's bug page. > But claiming that initng was more mature than upstart (or upstart way > more experimental) is FUD, sorry. I didn't mean to, sorry. It was just my one-day-experience. I'm happy that there's something more mature than initng then! :) Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature