[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to cope with patches sanely (Was: State of the project - input needed)

On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:16:39PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:33:40PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Yes. Merge is liable to be trickier since there are a couple of
> > > different possible sets of semantics, but that's much more likely to be
> > > an operation performed by the regular maintenance team than by a
> > > drive-by uploader, so that doesn't worry me too much.
> > 
> >   Well, in a perfect wold, people would be able when they do a NMU e.g.
> > to commit into a public branch with a known location, and the regular
> > maintenance team will be the one that would merge it back into the
> > packaging mainline.
> With the consent of the maintainer, the public branch with the known
> location could be identical to the packaging mainline (à la
> collab-maint).

  Well, I'm more fond of the git approach where branches are writeable
only for me, and where I can see other's and pull from there at will
(and they can as well of course). But YMMV.

> But in any case, I was actually referring to merging new upstream
> versions into Debian, not to merging work done by non-maintainers,
> although I didn't express myself very clearly.

  Oh I see, but really, I think that both problems are basically the
same, just not on the same scale :)
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpFxyJbG2w5H.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: