[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shouldn't apt-listchanges be Priority: standard?

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:34:23AM +0000, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Steve Langasek commented while closing this bug report:
> > > It is recommended that you use apt-listchanges on your system, to be
> > > notified of package behavior changes such as this.
> > 
> > Could we consider increasign the priority of apt-listchanges so that
> > it is installed by default?
> Perhaps apt-listchanges (or other, frontend-specific methods) in a
> default configuration to only show NEWS.Debian would be ideal?

  That is the default configuration for apt-listchanges, despite its
name, rationale being that people really interested in the full
changelog like I am, are also able to dpkg-reconfigure it to show "both"
NEWS and Changelog. It's NEWS only by default.

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpkduxT64yTX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: