Re: old bugs are still shown on the bugs page
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > [There is some argument that I should completely ignore hurd-i386 by
> > default since it isn't keeping up *at all* but I haven't made that
> > change yet.]
> It's been anoying for a long time and there is absolutely no
> I think I have requested this before. Can we now just do it, pretty
I've modified the code to now have an explicit default list of
architectures instead of assuming that all architectures are keeping
up [and made the version display more verbose for things that matter.]
That said, whoever is responsible for hurd these days should really
get it caught up.
What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for
someone more interesting.