[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: old bugs are still shown on the bugs page

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > [There is some argument that I should completely ignore hurd-i386 by
> > default since it isn't keeping up *at all* but I haven't made that
> > change yet.]
> It's been anoying for a long time and there is absolutely no
> improvement.


> I think I have requested this before. Can we now just do it, pretty
> please?

I've modified the code to now have an explicit default list of
architectures instead of assuming that all architectures are keeping
up [and made the version display more verbose for things that matter.]

That said, whoever is responsible for hurd these days should really
get it caught up.

Don Armstrong

What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for 
someone more interesting.

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Reply to: