[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft new policy document format

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:21:10 -0500, Eric Cooper <ecc@cmu.edu> said: 

> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:34:28PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> In addition to that, just some tiny nitpicking below.  [...]

> I had the same initial reaction, but when I re-read Manoj's
> introduction, I think he suggests that this docbook format should be
> the *output* of an XSLT tool; the various policies would be encoded as
> individual XML entities with a more semantically appropriate schema
> (TBD, I guess).

        You give me too much credit :-)

        I was not thinking of this as an output; though if there are
 more semantically appropriate schemas for a rule, then I would
 appreciate people presenting them here; I am not wedded to the draft
 format in any way.  I confess I spent only about 30 minutes to an hour
 drawing up the draft, so if people treat it as a strawman proposal to
 be knocked down by a better schema, the better for us, I say.

It takes all kinds to fill the freeways. Crazy Charlie
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: