Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
[Please preserve attribution lines on quoted material, so we can see
who said what in your message.]
"Paul Wise" <email@example.com> writes:
> On Nov 29, 2007 9:48 AM, Ben Finney <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a
> > > new RC bug has been submitted, it's a rather likely situation
> > > that the bug is present in unstable and wasn't present before.
> > I don't see how you get the "and wasn't present before" part of
> > that. Surely this is exactly what version tagging is for?
> Only way would be to map dates to versions.
Not the "only way"; the BTS already has the ability for the user to
*explicitly state* which version of the package has the bug.
\ "Our products just aren't engineered for security." —Brian |
`\ Valentine, senior vice-president of Microsoft Windows |
_o__) development, 2002 |