Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
"Shaun Jackman" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Nov 24, 2007 11:05 PM, Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Because there's no version information on bug #449176, so britney
> > concludes that both the old and new versions of the package are
> > equally buggy.
> That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a new RC
> bug has been submitted, it's a rather likely situation that the bug is
> present in unstable and wasn't present before.
I don't see how you get the "and wasn't present before" part of that.
Surely this is exactly what version tagging is for?
\ "I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury." -- |
`\ Groucho Marx |