Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:54:08 +0930
Message-id: <[🔎] e13a36b30711281624l4f208e1cs6fee434eca675f78@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87aboxsy4e.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <[🔎] 7f45d9390711241652t172cb2f1w9d53641f9357a05f@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20071125060545.GD27825@dario.dodds.net> <[🔎] 7f45d9390711281549r150b6f59v4364dddd70f5899f@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87aboxsy4e.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

On Nov 29, 2007 9:48 AM, Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> wrote:

> > That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a new RC
> > bug has been submitted, it's a rather likely situation that the bug is
> > present in unstable and wasn't present before.
>
> I don't see how you get the "and wasn't present before" part of that.
> Surely this is exactly what version tagging is for?

Only way would be to map dates to versions.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>

References:
- RC buggy package migrated to testing
  - From: "Shaun Jackman" <sjackman@gmail.com>
- Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
  - From: "Shaun Jackman" <sjackman@gmail.com>
- Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
Next by Date: Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
Previous by thread: Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
Next by thread: Re: RC buggy package migrated to testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread