Daniel Schepler schrieb: > On Tuesday 20 November 2007 10:26:39 pm Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> On 21/11/2007, Daniel Schepler wrote: >>> Obviously, a lot of these will be false positives, so I definitely >>> won't file mass bugs based on this list without checking the full >>> details first. >> Maybe suggesting a lintian check would be a good idea? >> >> Cheers, > > It would be hard to write a check without numerous false positives. Under > those circumstances I think they would be classified as "I:" messages, which > hardly anybody would see anyway. I suppose it would be possible to write a > check for empty /usr/sbin, /usr/bin, /etc, ... in packages != base-files, but > that would miss a lot of cases. Imho adding a lintian check for empty /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/lib and /usr/include directories (as created by dh-make) would be a good start. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature