Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?
2007/9/26, Patrick Schoenfeld <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The reason why maintainers may be checked far more thoroughly is
> > because the average employee of Google or Microsoft can't make changes
> > to any piece of software company wide, nor do they vote on the
> > direction of the entire company. [It's also far easier to fire someone
> > than it is to remove a Developer.]
>
> Nor can they write emails with the branding of Debian as a project (and
> eventually throw a bad light on it), nor can they use (and possibly
> abuse) the infrastructure a dozen volunteers provide.
Why just new maintainers are checked so precisely? The old Debian
developers also can make a threat for Debian Project. It's logical,
that everybody should be checked, especially the old developers which
didn't be check so paranoid in the past.
I hope you see the absurdity in this procedure...
--
.''`. Piotr Roszatycki
: :' : mailto:Piotr.Roszatycki@gmail.com
`. `' mailto:dexter@debian.org
`-
Reply to: