Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file
Please don't email copies of list messages unless explicitly requested.
<URL:http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct>
Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> writes:
> On 11148 March 1977, Ben Finney wrote:
> > IANADD, but would argue that making the copyright file, including
> > any email addresses, machine-parseable is a worthwhile goal. This
> > goal precludes munging the address.
>
> You mean the foo at bar dot com value isnt parseable?
That form isn't the only way email addresses get munged. The line
needs to be drawn somewhere; I would argue "valid RFC2821 email
address" is the place to draw it.
> I dont think it has any value to encode an address like this, as any
> little spambot can EASILY decode that.
Agreed. I would not be against a policy requirement that email
addresses in package metadata should be the literal address without
munging.
--
\ "If [a technology company] has confidence in their future |
`\ ability to innovate, the importance they place on protecting |
_o__) their past innovations really should decline." -- Gary Barnett |
Ben Finney
Reply to: