Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:45:07 +0200, Roland Mas <email@example.com>
>John Kelly, 2007-09-12 18:33:12 +0000 :
>> Again, if Debian's highly esteemed social contract is for the
>> benefit of users, then why not let users vote?
>We do, actually. Those users who do show interest in influencing the
>course of Debian by concrete actions rather than by mailing-list
>trolling are entitled to vote. Others aren't.
> How do we know the difference? The criterion is known as the NM
>process. It's open to all.
If only maintainers qualify as "users" then your social contract is a