On Jul 31, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote: > > FWIW, presently the only inet-superserver package that doesn't depend on > > update-inetd is rlinetd, and it diverts /usr/sbin/update-inetd rather > > than conflicting. > That seems wrong to me, too, although it probably predates the > update-inetd package. Indeed, it's buggy. > I'm at a bit of a loss now as to whether to change lintian's checks or > not, although I did update the long description of that tag to not push > depending on update-inetd directly. Yes, because it's *wrong* for all the reasons I explained in this thread. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature