Re: stupid dependencies on update-inetd
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Couldn't any inet-superserver package that provides its own update-inetd
> also Provide: update-inetd? Wouldn't that fix the problem? It has to
> Conflict with update-inetd anyway.
FWIW, presently the only inet-superserver package that doesn't depend on
update-inetd is rlinetd, and it diverts /usr/sbin/update-inetd rather than
conflicting.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: