Re: stupid dependencies on update-inetd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 29, Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de> wrote:
> > If you want a system without an inetd then do not it install one and do
> > not install packages depending on it. It's really that easy.
> Sorry but I think you didn't understand what I tryed to explain.
I do, it's you who have no idea about the discussions of the past five
years.
> The problem is not to not have a inetd installed. The problem is that
> there are many inetd out there. One is the xinetd which is replacing a
> "traditional" inetd completely. But today the traditional inetd has to
> be installed too. Xinetd do disable such a inetd in postinstall script.
Yes, the xinetd package needs to be integrated with the rest of Debian.
> However. What I did explain is that xinetd do not need to have a
> update-inetd as the configuration is done with single files for single
> packages.
No, it needs an update-inetd program which can create configuration
files in the appropriate format.
- --
ciao,
Marco
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGrMdAFGfw2OHuP7ERAm6WAJ9KyWAnFl9UPwT7a0sJ53Ax437mRQCePYf/
CtQ0T8fD3TP6J5QA6hHdxHY=
=6Y6W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: