Re: Are popcon stats per package and arch possible?
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 10:15:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> >> [Michael Hanke]
>> >> > To me it looks like stats for the major architectures up to (and
>> >> > including) powerpc are ok wrt privacy concerns. Do you agree?
>> >> I'm not sure if that would be the correct cutoff point, or if only
>> >> amd64 and i386 have enough submissions to ignore the privacy issue.
>> > Well, at that point what use is a per-arch stat anyway?
>> So porters can see what package are most usefull for that
> Ok, WTF. How have four different people missed the point here that *being
> able to get per-arch per-package statistics only for i386 and amd64 does not
> give meaningful per-arch information*?
If you have i386, amd64, ppc and others that would still be somewhat
usefull. The others would be important to keep. Otherwise I totaly
agree with you. I expect i386 and amd64 to be nearly identical to each
other and the total.