Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Further, will transitioning to cdebconf be possible if the only common > specification is that behind the debconf-2.0 virtual package > (http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/debconf_specification.html)? This remains to be seen. The best way to find out would be for adventerous people to start installing cdebconf, exporting DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF=1, and seeing what breaks. Probably quite a few things will, initially. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature