Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?

To: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:00:47 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070108160047.GC14691@ouaza.com>
Mail-followup-to: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] entkot$um1$2@sea.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 20070108080303.GA17009@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 20070108080827.GE14579@hades.madism.org> <[🔎] 20070108141106.GA5750@df7cb.de> <[🔎] entkot$um1$2@sea.gmane.org>

On Mon, 08 Jan 2007, Marcus Better wrote:
> Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer
> > view. The GIS team does that:
> 
> Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also,
> without having the mailing list in the Maintainer field?

Subscribe the mailing list to the PTS.
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-pkg-tracking-system

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/

Reply to:

References:
- Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
  - From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
- Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
  - From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

Prev by Date: Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
Next by Date: Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
Previous by thread: Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
Next by thread: Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread