Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-01-08 <[🔎] 20070108080827.GE14579@hades.madism.org> > > The perl team, on the other hand, uses the different scheme: > > Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" > > Uploaders: the team mailing list, + members who actually care for the > > package (who have touched it in the past, for example). It doesn't matter much if the main maintainer is in the Maintainer: or Uploaders: field as long as the package list is not overly cluttered. > > This leads to much shorter and interesting DDPO pages, without any > > drawback I can see (the "all packages from the team" DDPO page is still > > available using the the team mailing list address). Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer view. The GIS team does that: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature