Santiago Vila wrote: > Well, what I see is that after an upgrade from sarge to etch, the user > may have an empty /usr/doc. But even in such case, it is not base-files > business to remove symlinks indiscriminately in /usr/doc, as they > could be there because the system admin puts them there deliberately > for whatever reason. How would you feel about removing only broken symlinks? if [ -d /usr/doc ] && [ ! -L /usr/doc ]; then find -L /usr/doc -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -lname \* -print0 | xargs -0 rm -f rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /usr/doc 2>/dev/null fi -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature