Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Well, today I have fixed the last two remaining bugs that blocked this > bug (I'll have to followup to them to see whether the fixes will get to > Etch, but that is not really on topic for this bug per se). Excellent. I note that we still arn't 100% sure we've caught every last upgrade issue involving /usr/doc, since AFAIK puiparts has not been used to test upgrades of everything. Also, I see that there are still some lintian warnings about it at http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html but I guess these are obsolete, since it was last updated in August. I spot-checked a couple of packages and they seem fixed. > Hence, I think now is the time to continue with the next steps as > outlined in the first message in the bug, right? Yes, I think it's time to reassign it to base-files, to get the directory removed on upgrade if it's empty. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature