On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 11:30 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Well, the goal was (in part) to catch scripts which use non-Posix > > features of echo and test; why are non-Posix features of ls not an > > issue? > > <quote> > Since I cannot think of a legitimate reason for anyone to use > ls in a shell script, I think it would add little value. > <unquote> Makes you wonder why it's in Posix.2 at all, huh? (Posix.2 is about scripts, not user interaction.) How about grep? Is there a legitimate reason to use grep? Can we have a list of which Posix.2 shell commands may not be legitimately used in shell scripts? Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part