On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 18:15 -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > A builtin ls might be a good idea for disaster recovery shells, > though zsh-static does not have it. posh is not intended to be > such a shell, nor to be particularly useful interactively. > Since I cannot think of a legitimate reason for anyone to use > ls in a shell script, I think it would add little value. Well, the goal was (in part) to catch scripts which use non-Posix features of echo and test; why are non-Posix features of ls not an issue? Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part