Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 11/28/06, Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm personally leaning towards to two arch: all packages (one 32-bit, >> one 64-bit) and a meta-package which depends on the right one. I am >> considering and open to the one arch: any package though. If it >> affects the decision, the binary package is roughly 1.2 MB. > > I take it back. I implemented the arch: all method, and it wasn't that > tricky, but the arch: any method is definitely technically simpler. > Without a good reason, I can't see why I shouldn't use the simpler > method. The argument for the arch: any case is obvious -- it's simpler > -- what's the best argument for the arch: all case? > > Cheers, > Shaun > > Less archive/mirror bloat.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature